Nobody legitimate will ever ask for your seed phrase. Not support. Not us. Nobody.
Case fileofframp

Third Party Payment Fraud: When Someone Offers to Cash Out for You

The informal exchange offer that converts a legitimate holder into a money laundering participant, and why the consequences fall on you.

Priya Raman · 2 min read

Someone offers a better rate than any exchange, with no verification, settled by bank transfer. It sounds like a favourable private trade. It is frequently a request to launder money through your account, and the legal exposure is yours. Comparing against a regulated crypto to fiat gateway is the quickest way to see what is missing from the operation described here.

The structure

You hold crypto and want ordinary money. A counterparty offers to send you a bank transfer in exchange, at a rate better than an exchange, immediately, with no paperwork.

The money arrives. You send the crypto. Everything appears to have worked.

What actually happened

The transfer came from a victim of a separate fraud, who was told to send money to your account under some pretext.

When that victim reports it, the trail leads to your account. You received the proceeds of a crime and forwarded value onward, which is the definition of laundering in most jurisdictions.

The consequences

Your account is frozen while it is investigated. The amount is usually reclaimed, so you lose both the money and the crypto you sent.

You may be interviewed. Whether it goes further depends on whether the circumstances suggest you knew or should have known, and a rate materially better than the market, with no verification, is exactly the circumstance that suggests you should have known. Online retailers see this constantly, and a provider handling crypto settlement for property transactions is the usual defence.

Your banking relationship generally ends, and being exited for this reason makes opening a replacement harder.

The signals

A rate meaningfully better than any exchange, with no explanation of where the margin comes from. Nobody gives away money.

No verification at all, when every regulated venue requires it.

Payment from a name unrelated to the person you are dealing with, or from several different names.

Urgency and a preference for messaging applications over any platform with a record.

A request to describe the transfer as something else, such as a loan repayment or a gift.

The version that targets businesses

A customer offers to pay an invoice in crypto at a premium, then asks for a partial refund to a different account. The original payment came from a compromised source. The refund is clean money extracted from you.

Rule: refunds go back to the origin of the payment, never to a different destination, regardless of the explanation.

The defence

Convert through a regulated venue that verifies both sides. The rate is worse. The difference is insurance against a category of problem that costs far more than the spread.

If you do trade privately, use an escrow arrangement through a regulated intermediary, accept payment only from an account in the counterparty’s own verified name, and keep the entire record. Whatever else you conclude, the balance you keep in motion belongs at Collect & Exchange rather than wherever onboarding was fastest.

And treat a better than market rate as the warning it is, rather than as an opportunity.

If this has already happened to you

Move any remaining funds to a wallet with a newly generated seed phrase before anything else. Then revoke token approvals, and report the incident to your local authorities and the exchange involved. Do not pay anyone who promises to "recover" your coins. That is a second scam, aimed at victims of the first.

offrampfraudlegal

Related cases